- By: Major Nadeem Baig (R)
In today’s era, the landscape of warfare is being reshaped by technology. Drones now dominate the skies, cyber weapons silently paralyze enemy systems, and precision airstrikes destroy targets without warning. Analysts often suggest that the future belongs to machines, networks, and long-range capabilities rather than boots on the ground. Yet, despite these advances, one reality remains unchanged: wars are ultimately decided on the ground.
- The Illusion of Technological Supremacy
Drones can neutralize high-value targets, and cyber attacks can cripple communications, but neither can occupy territory or secure a city. Air superiority may pave the way for military dominance, but it cannot raise a flag over a captured enemy capital. Technology is a force multiplier, not a replacement for ground forces.
-Historical Lessons
Recent conflicts—from Iraq and Afghanistan to Ukraine—demonstrate that airstrikes and drones can weaken an enemy, but holding terrain and stabilizing populations requires soldiers. Russia’s use of cyber warfare and long-range missiles in Ukraine inflicted damage, but progress stalled without effective infantry and armored forces. Similarly, the United States, despite unmatched air power, needed ground troops to control territory in Iraq and Afghanistan.
- Marka-e-Haq: The Present Reality
The ongoing Marka-e-Haq between Pakistan and India in 2025 is a living example of this truth. Both sides have employed drones, long-range missiles, electronic warfare, and cyber attacks to disrupt logistics and intelligence systems. Yet, the battles that truly decide the outcome are fought by ground forces along the Line of Control, in mountain passes, and in villages where soldiers clash face to face.
Pakistani ground troops—supported by armor, artillery, and anti-air defenses—remain the shield of the nation. Despite heavy drone strikes and digital disruptions, their physical presence on the front lines ensures that territory is not only defended but also contested where necessary. This struggle proves that while technology can weaken the enemy, it is the grit and sacrifice of soldiers that turns battles into victories.
- Human Presence and Psychological Impact
Ground troops provide not only physical control but also psychological dominance. The sight of soldiers patrolling streets, guarding borders, or securing towns creates an undeniable presence that technology cannot replicate. Civilians look to ground forces for security and governance, while enemies recognize that defeat is real only when their territory is physically taken.
- Combined Arms: The Balanced Approach
Modern warfare requires synergy—drones, cyber, and air assets weaken the enemy, while ground forces achieve the decisive blow. Tanks, artillery, infantry, and special operations remain the backbone of victory. Without them, high-tech assaults become endless bombardments with no conclusive outcome.
- Conclusion
The future of warfare is hybrid. Technology will continue to evolve, making drones deadlier, cyber weapons more sophisticated, and airstrikes more precise. But the human element of ground combat will always be indispensable. The Marka-e-Haq of 2025 reminds us that despite modern tools of destruction, ultimate victory comes when soldiers hold the line, secure ground, and raise the flag of triumphs.